R22 USERS MOVE INTO BORROWED TIME

The phase-out of R22 in the EU has been a long time coming. The date should be in
the diary of every facilities manager, building owner and contractor, and plans should
be laid to ensure continuity of cooling for affected buildings, says David Dunn of
Toshiba Air Conditioning.
One of the most popular refrigerant gases used in air conditioning finally hits the
buffers at the end of this year. From midnight on 31 December 2014, it will become
illegal to use reclaimed R22 refrigerant, along with other reclaimed HCFC refrigerants,
for servicing and topping up equipment.
Implementation of the ban represents the completion of a long process of evertightening
restrictions, designed to reduce the use of ozone-depleting refrigerants
across Europe. It follows the ban on the use of new R22 for servicing equipment,
introduced at the beginning of 2010. The ban on using reclaimed R22 has major
implications for those still reliant on the gas, as well as contractors responsible for
servicing affected plant. Reclaimed R22 will no longer be available to purchase from
suppliers, and any stored reclaimed R22 may not be used to service plant. This leaves
those with R22 plant facing some pressing choices.
A significant number of systems across the UK still operate on R22 refrigerant. Just
how many is hard to determine, but estimates range from 100 000 up to as many as
500 000. The actual figure probably lies somewhere in between the two. The most
exposed in terms of air-conditioning equipment are commercial offices, healthcare,
hospitality, pharmaceuticals and data processing. There is also believed to be a
significant amount of refrigeration plant still running on R22, used in chillers, cold
stores and process coolers. It is important to note that end users can legally continue
to operate equipment containing R22 beyond the end of this year. If a system is
operational, gas-tight and not subject to leaks, there is no obligation to remove the
R22.
However, it will be illegal to carry out maintenance or servicing that involves breaking
into an R22 refrigerant circuit. This is to prevent accidental release of HCFCs to the
atmosphere. If and when it becomes necessary to top up a system, or break into a
circuit, the R22 refrigerant must be replaced with a non-ozone-depleting alternative.
This may or may not be possible or advisable, depending on the nature of the plant,
its age and cost considerations.
Continued on next page// NEWS MONITORING
Issue: December 2014
30
Contractors should be advising their end-user customers affected about the
implications for equipment and the options to deal with the change. Depending on the
age and suitability of equipment, it may be worth retrofitting to operate equipment on
one of the non-ozone-depleting alternatives. A number of these are available, and
suppliers will be able to advise on suitability. If equipment is older, retrofitting may be
harder to justify on economic grounds. In this case, it may be necessary to consider
replacing equipment.
In applications with business-critical cooling requirements, this may be the preferred
option in any case, to ensure continuity of service for people or industrial production.
While replacing equipment may at first sight seem the more costly option, capital costs
may be offset by the often very significant improvements in energy efficiency that can
be achieved by the use of modern equipment. Servicing and maintenance costs are
also likely to be lower on new plant. Taking these factors into consideration may often
sway the calculation in favour of fitting new systems, particularly if existing equipment
has limited working life remaining. In assessing whether to replace equipment, a
further consideration comes into play in relation to its adequacy for current needs.
Due to changes in building use over time, existing plant may no longer be adequate to
fully meet current cooling and heating requirements. Replacing equipment, therefore,
offers an opportunity to increase capacity to meet the changed requirements, resulting
in more comfortable and productive occupants.
Due to the lead time on retrofit and replacement projects, it is important that work is
planned well in advance. Once the precise nature and scale of the issues on a
particular site are understood, an action plan can be drawn up — to include an
evaluation of the options available and the anticipated costs. Budgets can then be
allocated and work planned to complete before a crisis arises that could result in loss
of service for a building. The next challenge for the industry on the refrigerants front
is of course the coming phase-down of the use of HFCs with high global-warming
potentials (GWP). The changes are being introduced as part of the EU’s revision of the
F-Gas Regulation. One of the most important effects is likely to be a move away from
the use of R410A, a refrigerant currently widely used in air conditioning, ironically as a
replacement for R22 systems. Although R410A is a safe and efficient fluid, its GWP
value means that it is caught in the new phase-down programme. Timescales for
implementation of the F-Gas changes are relatively long, and it will be several years
before the measure begins to bite. In the meantime, a range of alternatives are
currently being evaluated by the leading manufacturers. It may be a while before a
consensus emerges on the industry’s preferred long-term solution.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: